What is Nature Loop? How come something is missing?
Despite the fact that it is impossible to prove that there is more than just a human point of view because any such evidence would include a human point of view (saw, heard, thought, calculated, etc.), scientific agreements. and the so-called real purpose "outside," beyond the view of man who claims to explain nature honestly (as if there is a Nature or truth beyond human perception). The shocking impact of the Matrix was a legitimate chance that what we believed was real was our vision; however, this was presented by showing the real truth when what was seen was computer simulation. Many who play with the idea that perhaps, we are computer programmers, wander into questions, such as, who can build such software and what kind of hardware might be needed to do just that. While such questions assume that truth is our theory, it also considers the existence of a world to decide "out there" which should be responsible for how we perceive our truth. This is a big mistake that emphasizes technology and algorithms instead of trying to find the true nature and structure of nature. As will be shown in the following, the necessary paradigm flexibility shifts from “realizing our reality centered on a meaningful world,” to “a realistic view without the need for a meaningful world 'out there,'” provided by a flexible structure. . Holophanic loop logic is responsible for a consistent and complete worldview that not only describes, but also creates anything that cannot be seen or experienced.
To say that it is impossible to prove the existence of anything beyond human perception does not mean that it is nothing but an opinion, only that if there is anything, then anything exists, there is no end. It might be argued that the existence of the laws of nature, the universal view that the apple falls to the ground, is a testament to the fact of purpose. However, this international agreement is our vision. It can be argued that if we can decide what we should see, and everyone sees the same physical truth, there should be some law that sets out the way we see it, therefore, this legitimacy would be beyond our view. However, this is legal, as we will see later, is the precise law that creates the idea, the process of interpretation, which is not without vision (this process creates visuals and explorer, which then gives meaning to this process - a loop - but about that, later). It can be argued that, kneeling at the table - whether we believe at the table or not - will hurt us. The table is outside our body, but not in our view. What, then, is the idea? It is related, the process of interpretation, interpretation and thus gives a reasonable idea of what is being thought.
What, then, is the definition process? It creates boundaries where a person's point of view gains meaning. The word “meaning” comes from the Latin de finire, meaning, to make a conclusion or to limit. In Hebrew, the meaning is HAGDARA, that is, a border. Any definition means that the meaning does not exist, or is said in a different way, in order to have a meaning, anything that is clearly defined includes the meaning by subtracting everything else. As a result, to define means to place something defined within the boundaries that automatically creates something beyond the boundaries of the definition. What is this that is beyond description? Infinite has taken out everything else, or in other words, infinite. The critical importance of endless installation within a harmonious logical structure cannot be overemphasized. Infinitely in itself is a paradox, and incorporating it into a logical Holophanic structure creates a loop of Nature in which the flexible formation of paradoxes both the creative power of existence, as well as evidence of the need for existence.
To better grasp the force of Nature, let's look at the endless and the complexities. What does it mean to be “forever”? Anything as long as it is not specified (not specified); anything that arises within and outside the boundaries of the definition and thus gives the limit to exceed, that is, there is no limit, no meaning. If we can only try to define the term "indefinite," then that is confusing because if we succeed, then it is explained, which contradicts its meaning - its infinity - and the word "indefinite" means it cannot be explained. This is an example of the paradox, that it actually means that, if it is, it means that it is not, yet if it is not, it means what it is. Paradox is a creature with a structure (the way it is described, a flexible process on the path to sustainability) that contradicts its importance (reality, sustainable business). What confuses the movement is the structure between the structure and its value, in which the structure explains that its value conflicts with its structure, as well.
Another example of a paradox would be "perfection." Perfection (total, infinite, infinite) can only be perfect if we can find a way to define it to include everything and nothing but you. However, if we define completeness, then to have meaning, there must be boundaries within the walls of meaning, which means that there is more than this boundary, otherwise not everything. Or in the official language, perfection is only perfection if not perfection, which is incompatibility. If we are satisfied with that, then we have completed the definition of perfection. However, if we try to incorporate more than what has been created by our previous meaning within the limits of our next attempt to define completeness, then we find a new definition of perfection, which by means of a complete definition of the definition process creates something new. In this case, the process of defining perfection will be permanent but incomplete, and perfection will remain elusive.Another example of a paradox would be "perfection." Perfection (total, infinite, infinite) can only be perfect if we can find a way to define it to include everything and nothing but you. However, if we define completeness, then to have meaning, there must be boundaries within the walls of meaning, which means that there is more than this boundary, otherwise not everything. Or in the official language, perfection is only perfection if not perfection, which is incompatibility. If we are satisfied with that, then we have completed the definition of perfection. However, if we try to incorporate more than what has been created by our previous meaning within the limits of our next attempt to define completeness, then we find a new definition of perfection, which by means of a complete definition of the definition process creates something new. In this case, the process of defining perfection will be permanent but incomplete, and perfection will remain elusive.
When you think about the mysteries of Creation, you remember the ancient Egyptian myth of Creation, the myth of the self-created god, Amun (or Amon). Amun masturbated and swallowed his sperm, then spit it out like a ball, thus impregnating his mother, the sky. And after that, he was born. Thus Amun was his father. Those saints who received a paraphrase version of this Karnak myth closed Amun's straightforward phallus, and with it, the story of Creation was exposed. The Holophanic Model of Creation can view this Egyptian myth as the re-creation of Amun. I coined the word retromorphous to mean, to define by looking back, to turn absentness into the power of any observation made, or in other words, to create the past from the present, to create the source from its effect, which is the basis of difficulty in the context of logic logic. That is, only after Amun's birth can he explain to his mother, the power from which he came and the old system (as represented by masturbation and incest) when he was born. Of course, the sky or Amun who masturbates has meaning until Creation happens de facto and Amun appears. I find this to be an interesting illustration of the basic mystery of existence.So how could something be out of the ordinary? What is "nothing?" There is nothing that has not become a force for good. If there was nothing from something, then nothing would turn into the power of something, because when we ask, how does it happen that something comes from something, we ask this question to something, where it already exists. If we look closely at “nothing,” we will find that “nothing” is a mystery. Any definition is something, so when we define “nothing,” it will be something that contradicts its essence of “nothing.” Another way to look at “nothing” would be to be a trivial matter. That is, "nothing" can be something unrelated and nothing or no one is connected to. That is, if there were only one thing in the universe, that would be nothing, but it would be in vain. If that were the case, his existence would be without our knowledge, and thus, this “nothing” would be infinite.
We said infinity can be anything, as long as it is not specified (can be explained). However, if we try to define “nothing” (infinite), what will we find there? Since "nothing" cannot be explained, it is obvious as something we ask. So when we try to explain it, all we have is what we put into it, which is the process of interpretation. "Nothing" was not always there, we did not explain it, we only made the definition process clear. “Nothing” gains meaning when we cannot explain it; but after trying, we are left with a bonus, something, which is our plan to define “nothing.” The creation of the non-existent is not the work of explaining something, but the work of trying to explain “nothing.” And then, if that definition process - which already exists - looks back to its origin, if this definition process explores its genesis, then what does it see? It sees it. It sees the process of interpretation - self-reference.
If there is nothing out of sight, then this definition process is complete, the creator of the definition where it can interact with it. However, for there to be meaning, the process of interpretation must be explained; this definition will be a quasi-infinite process of self-determination and a continuous process of establishing boundaries that create infinity beyond what constitutes unlimited creative boundaries beyond that which sets boundaries… that is, perfection will always fail to define itself while successfully defining something. - anything without it.
Yes, both fully explained and infinite are logical ideas that are incompatible with Holophanic loop logic, and cannot be found in nature. Infinity would be a completely useless thing, the kind of person who is incomprehensible because if we could think about it, it would be a thing. On the other hand, there can be no complete explanation again. I used the word uncertainty to describe the logical impossibility of a complete meaning. A defined business can be said to have achieved similarities.